Entries in technology (3)

Tuesday
Jan262010

My Wish List for the Apple Tablet

New product announcements usually don't get my attention, but tomorrow's pending tablet announcement by Apple has me clearing my schedule to watch Steve Jobs unveil his new tablet. The hype has grown so big that people who don't usually care about technology announcements have been asking me what I think will be released. Many, many sites have been discussing the new Tablet, and the latest roundup of rumors is here at MacRumors.

I have no idea what the new Tablet will contain. There have been a lot of rumors but few definites, though this exec at McGraw-Hill may be looking for a new job if he really did reveal insider information. Instead, let me list a few things I would like the Tablet to contain if I were in charge of its development.

  • Strike a deal with Amazon. Let there be three tiers of content delivery. The standard Kindle would deliver books, and that's it. At under $300 it does an excellent job at doing what it is designed to do. The Kindle DX would deliver text book and journal/magazine/newspaper content at the $500 price point. Its primary market would be academic. The new Apple Tablet would merge video/television into the mix, while giving the option to view magazines and newspapers, all in 720p color. At $900 the Tablet is really for those who want to add movies and television to the mix. Amazon's video on demand can provide this content.
  • Amazon owns Audible. Audible is the best provider of audio books. Sorry Overdrive, but it's true. Audible's audio books could sync with Amazon's ebooks and allow the user to switch seamlessly between reading and listening. A lot of people I know like to do this, and making it seemless would attract a new style of reader.
  • Strike a deal with Netflix to allow Netflix subscribers to easily view content on the new Tablet. Yes, Amazon's on demand video content is good, but Apple needs greater depth and video downloads via iTunes are slow and expensive. The Netflix subscription model of streaming is a much better developed service.
  • Subsidize the cellular connectivity just like Amazon does for the Kindle. Leo Laporte has been arguing this for a long time and I have to agree. Base cellular service needs to be included in the package, even if it's just for content download and streaming and does not include browsing or email.
  • Offer a web browser and the same quality email interface found on the iPhone. A web browser and email require ever-present connectivity. This may need to be an extra-cost service but a Tablet without the option for web browsing or email will fail. The two cheaper Kindles can get away with not providing email, but the Tablet can't. One option here is to allow tethering to the iPhone so users don't have to pay for two monthly data plans.
  • Don't build Flash into the browser. Force developers to keep moving towards HTML5.
  • A forward facing webcam would allow the type of collaboration iPhone users have been wanting for a long time.
  • Put a flip-out stand on the back and don't make me buy an overpriced accessory just so I can stand the Tablet up on my desk.

And that's about it for my wish-list. My wants are more content related than the tech of the Tablet itself. A lot of what I want would be answered with a strong relationship with Amazon, but it could be done via other sources (though I question how well anyone else can do it). The tech side is important, but not so much as the content. Oh, a 10" OLED screen would be nice, and a power-conserving but powerful CPU is needed, but what will really matters is the content that I can enjoy on the new Tablet.

Looking forward to tomorrow's announcement!

Thursday
Dec312009

Looking Back In Order to Look Forward

Inspired by my friend's post over on ALA TechSource, I decided to take a brief look back at the technology that I was using in 2000 and see how it compares to the gear I use today.

First up is my camera, which back in 2000 was a Nikon F100, which used film. I paid about 50 cents per print ($6 for decent film + $12 for good processing / 36 exposures) and I used a Nikon LS-2000 Coolscan scanner to (slowly/tediously) digitize the film. I then spent a few minutes per print in Photoshop (v5) just trying to remove the dust from the scan. It was costly, cumbersome, and I don't miss it at all. If I wanted to share a photo I either had to email it, print and mail it, or use one of the cumbersome online services like Ofoto.

Today I use a Canon 40D and a Panasonic Lumix GF1. Both are digital and the per-picture cost is zero. I take hundreds of photos every month, use Photoshop (v11) and Lightroom to manage and edit them, and use Flickr to share them with my friends and the world. When I want to print something out I use MPIX Pro to make a long lasting print on true photo paper.

In 2000 my desktop computer was a Gateway with a 600MHz Pentium III. It cost over $2,000 and had a 15" CRT monitor. I connected to the Internet via a buggy and slow 384 Kbps DSL connection. I don't even want to think about how slow my work connection was.

Today my home desktop computer is an Apple iMac with a 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and a built-in 24" LCD and webcam. I connect to the Internet through a 12 Mbps FTTC connection. My work machine is a Dell Precision 7400 with dual quad-core Xeon processors and a blindingly fast 100 Mbps Metro-E connection to the net. Any slowness is due to the other person's server.

In 2000 my cell phone was a Motorola StarTAC. Its claim to fame was its ability to make decent phone calls. Oh, and it vibrated. And it made a cool sound when it snapped shut.

Today I use an Apple iPhone with 16GB of storage. With it I read my books via Kindle, surf the web, read and respond to email, get directions, find my friends, locate great places to eat, keep tabs on my kids, watch videos, take pictures, listen to podcasts, read the newspaper, and update my to-do list.  It also makes phone calls.

In 2000 I had a rather pricey Samsung DVD player. It required several firmware updates to keep up with the DRM changes that the movie publishers were instituting. DVDs cost me over $25 each, or about $6 to rent. Otherwise, I watched broadcast TV.

Today I (rarely) watch DVDs, and when I do it is on my Sony PS3 which can play Blu-ray DVDs and also play games and stream Netflix movies. Most of the films I watch are streamed direct via Netflix for $10 a month, or via AT&T's U-verse, or they are downloaded via Apple's iTunes to my Apple TV. I also use the Apple TV to watch video podcasts.

I got a lot of my news online in 2000, but I still stopped at the coffee shop to read the print edition of the morning Times. The NY Times was, and remains, my primary source for international news. But today I read it almost exclusively online. I make great use of Google Reader to aggregate many other news and information sources. In 2000 I read the paper version of Foreign Affairs, the Economist, and Technology Review. Today I read many of these journals on my Kindle and iPhone, making far greater use of what used to be my down-time (doctor's offices, car repair shops, delayed meetings, etc.) My drive to work is now filled not with broadcast radio but with podcasts and music synced to my iPod. I'm definitely taking in more data today than I was in 2000. Whether I am remembering it all, well, that's an issue of biology and not technology.

Looking forward, I wonder how my life will be improved with the technological advances we're currently experiencing. I remain optimistic that the changes are for the better, and not for the worse. I look back to my grandmother, who died in 2001, and remember how she used to stay up late into the night, reading the latest hard covers of her favorite authors. She would only go to bed when the book got too heavy to hold. I imagine, were she alive today, just how much she would enjoy reading from the lightweight Kindle and listening to audio books via Overdrive and Audible. I can also see her in a modern kitchen, looking up recipes on the Cooks Illustrated website, commenting about something she read, and following her kids and grand kids on Facebook and Flickr.

I need only look back to realize how exciting the future will be.

Wishing everyone a wonderful decade...

Friday
Dec182009

Convergence: How Five Trends Will Reshape the Social Sector

From the John Irvine Foundation comes this very interesting report, Convergence: How Five Trends Will Reshape the Social Sector (~1 MB PDF).
What Will Define Nonprofits?

To adopt the role of futurist also demands that we ask ourselves and our organizations some difficult questions, such as:
• Are we truly and effectively engaging the right individuals, communities, and networks in our work?
What elements of our culture might be holding us back?
• What are we positioned to do uniquely better than anyone else? Is a 501(c)(3) the best structure to accomplish this goal? Do we even need to be an organization to accomplish our work?
• How do we keep on top of ways that our environment is changing? Are we as prepared as we can be for the uncertainty that is the future, and if not, what can we do to change that?
• What if the sector explored creative competitions to spur collaboration and knowledge sharing?
How Can Technology Help?

Technology, which is a significant driver of change, also affords powerful tools for collective thinking and action to position the sector to be proactive — not reactive — regarding these trends. Nonprofits must ask:
• What if the sector launched an open-source process for identifying and aggregating important new challenges and cutting-edge ideas?
• What if the sector employed social media tools to engage both professionals and volunteers in designing new approaches to service delivery or grantmaking?
• What if the sector explored creative competitions to spur collaboration and knowledge sharing?